In Jones, the court compared the injuries sustained by the ten-year-old plaintiff therein to the plaintiff in Weigl and found that the court did not take into consideration factors like "lost time from school; functional impairment to social, scholastic, and extracurricular activities; and young age" (id.).
Summary of this case from Yanes v. City of New YorkDecided April 21, 1980
ORDER AFFIRMED
In Jones, the court compared the injuries sustained by the ten-year-old plaintiff therein to the plaintiff in Weigl and found that the court did not take into consideration factors like "lost time from school; functional impairment to social, scholastic, and extracurricular activities; and young age" (id.).
Summary of this case from Yanes v. City of New YorkFull title:JONES v. NEW YORK CITY TR. AUTH
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Apr 21, 1980
The cases cited either do not involve so-called maximum sustainable jury verdicts or are factually…