From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 2, 2014
2014-3072 (Fed. Cir. May. 2, 2014)

Opinion

2014-3072

05-02-2014

MARIA LAVINIA JONES, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CB-7121-13-0111-V-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of Energy moves to reform the official caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") as the proper respondent, and for a 21 day extension of time, for the Board to file its opening brief. Maria Lavinia Jones opposes.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Maria Lavinia Jones's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

(2) The Board's informal response brief is due within 21 days from the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court
s21


Summaries of

Jones v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 2, 2014
2014-3072 (Fed. Cir. May. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Jones v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:MARIA LAVINIA JONES, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 2, 2014

Citations

2014-3072 (Fed. Cir. May. 2, 2014)