From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JONES v. MEEK

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Apr 15, 1935
6 Cal.App.2d 193 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)

Opinion

Docket No. 9760.

April 15, 1935.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. James H. Pope, Judge pro tem. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

William M. Jones, in pro. per., for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, L.G. Campbell, Deputy Attorney-General, and John A. McGilvray for Respondents.


Petitioner appeals from a judgment of the trial court denying a writ of mandate which petitioner sought to secure to compel respondents to reinstate him as a "cashier" or senior clerk under civil service in the state department of motor vehicles.

[1] The trial court found on evidence which is ample and persuasive that petitioner was laid off from the job he had been filling because a lessening in the amount of work had required a reduction in the number of employees; that respondents had not abused their discretion in selecting petitioner for such release, because under the court's finding the latter was held to be the least efficient person so employed, and that temporary work during a period of increased activity in the department was offered to petitioner and by him refused.

We are aware of no authority which requires a department of the state government to retain such an employee, whether under civil service or not, under such circumstances.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P.J., and Crail, J., concurred.


Summaries of

JONES v. MEEK

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Apr 15, 1935
6 Cal.App.2d 193 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
Case details for

JONES v. MEEK

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM M. JONES, Appellant, v. BURT B. MEEK, as Director of Public Works…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Apr 15, 1935

Citations

6 Cal.App.2d 193 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
43 P.2d 812