From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. McGrath

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 25, 2009
No. 2:04-cv-01082-MCE-KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2009)

Opinion

No. 2:04-cv-01082-MCE-KJM P.

June 25, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On September 5, 2007, the magistrate judge recommended that the petition be denied. Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations on January 14, 2008. On January 28, 2008, this court adopted the findings and recommendations, denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and entered judgment. Petitioner did not appeal this order.

On June 5, 2009, petitioner filed a second set of objections to the findings and recommendations. The court will not consider these objections nor issue further orders in this case in light of the fact that judgment was entered nearly eighteen months ago.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. McGrath

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 25, 2009
No. 2:04-cv-01082-MCE-KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Jones v. McGrath

Case Details

Full title:CRYSTAL EUGENE JONES, Petitioner, v. JOE McGRATH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 25, 2009

Citations

No. 2:04-cv-01082-MCE-KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2009)