From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. E. McAtee

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0033-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0033-LKK-CMK-P.

January 21, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 35). The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not at this time find the required exceptional circumstances.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Doc. 35) is denied.

DATED: January 20, 2011


Summaries of

Jones v. E. McAtee

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0033-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Jones v. E. McAtee

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY JONES, Plaintiff, v. E. McATEE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 21, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0033-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)