From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Lyons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Jul 29, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:15-CV-523-MHT [WO] (M.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:15-CV-523-MHT [WO]

07-29-2015

LARRY JONES, #165 087, Plaintiff, v. RICKEY LYONS, COI, et al., Defendants.


RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Plaintiff alleges he was subjected to excessive force while incarcerated at the Fountain Correctional Facility. The Fountain Correctional Facility is located in Atmore, Alabama, which is within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama.

Upon review of the factual allegations presented in the complaint, the court concludes that this case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404.

Plaintiff's complaint is accompanied by a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The assessment and collection of any filing fee, however, should be undertaken by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. --------

I. DISCUSSION

A civil action filed by an inmate under authority of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 "may be brought . . . in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred . . . or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such action." 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The law further provides that "[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district . . . where it might have been brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

The actions about which Plaintiff complains occurred at the Fountain Correctional Facility which is located within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. The factual allegations set forth in the complaint reflect that the named defendants are located in the Southern District of Alabama. Thus, the majority of material witnesses and evidence associated with those claims relevant to Plaintiff's allegations are located in the Southern District of Alabama.

In light of the foregoing, the court concludes that in the interest of justice and for the convenience of the parties this case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama for review and determination.

II. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1404. It is further

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the said Recommendation on or before August 12, 2015. Any objections filed must specifically identify the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which the party is objecting. Frivolous, conclusive, or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The parties are advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the Magistrate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982); see Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc) (adopting as binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981).

Done this 29th day of July, 2015.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Lyons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Jul 29, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:15-CV-523-MHT [WO] (M.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Jones v. Lyons

Case Details

Full title:LARRY JONES, #165 087, Plaintiff, v. RICKEY LYONS, COI, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 29, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:15-CV-523-MHT [WO] (M.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2015)