From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Lumpkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Jun 15, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-CV-35 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 15, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-CV-35

06-15-2021

WILLIAM CURTIS JONES v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THAD HEARTFIELD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff William Curtis Jones, a former prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Bobby Lumpkin, Thomas John Burbank, Michael L. Davis, and Clinton Lewis.

The Court ordered that this matter be referred to the magistrate judge for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the claims against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No. objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (document no. 20) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with this memorandum order.


Summaries of

Jones v. Lumpkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Jun 15, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-CV-35 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Lumpkin

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM CURTIS JONES v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-CV-35 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 15, 2021)