Opinion
Case No. 2:10-CV-01200 JAM/KJN Civil Rights
10-13-2011
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN Catherine M. Cabalo, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff GUY JONES LAW OFFICES OF ROSENBERG & LINK Sid M. Rosenberg, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants BRYAN KWONG; SPENCER KWONG; IRENE KWONG; EL PUERTO RESTAURANT, INC.; & ISIDRO MARTIN RODRIGUEZ
PAUL L. REIN, Esq, (SBN 43053)
CELIA MCGUINNESS, Esq.(SBN 159420)
CATHERINE M. CABALO, Esq. (SBN 248198)
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GUY JONES
*Defendants and their counsel listed after the caption.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF
CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE
SID M. ROSENBERG, Esq. (SBN 129158)
LAW OFFICES OF ROSENBERG & LINK
Attorney for Defendants
BRYAN KWONG; SPENCER KWONG; IRENE
KWONG; EL PUERTO RESTAURANT, INC.; &
ISIDRO MARTIN RODRIGUEZ
STIPULATION
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff GUY JONES ("Plaintiff") and defendants BRYAN KWONG; SPENCER KWONG; IRENE KWONG; EL PUERTO RESTAURANT, INC.; and ISIDRO MARTIN RODRIGUEZ (together referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate that:
1. Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice as against all Defendants;
2. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the Consent Decree previously entered as an Order by the Court (see Docket No. 26); and
3. All parties shall bear his, her, or its own costs and fees in the action.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
Catherine M. Cabalo, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GUY JONES
LAW OFFICES OF ROSENBERG & LINK
Sid M. Rosenberg, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants
BRYAN KWONG; SPENCER
KWONG; IRENE KWONG; EL
PUERTO RESTAURANT, INC.; &
ISIDRO MARTIN RODRIGUEZ
ORDER
Having reviewed the above Stipulation for Dismissal of Claims with Prejudice submitted by plaintiff GUY JONES on the one hand ("Plaintiff"), and defendants BRYAN KWONG; SPENCER KWONG; IRENE KWONG; EL PUERTO RESTAURANT, INC.; and ISIDRO MARTIN RODRIGUEZ (said defendants together referred to as "Defendants") on the other hand,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice as against Defendants;
2. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the Consent Decree previously entered as an Order by the Court.
3. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and fees in the action.
Honorable JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Judge