From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. King Cnty.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 1, 2023
C22-0572 TSZ (W.D. Wash. Mar. 1, 2023)

Opinion

C22-0572 TSZ

03-01-2023

TODD RAY JONES, Plaintiff, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:

(1) The parties' stipulated motion to continue trial and related dates, docket no. 30, is GRANTED as follows:

JURY TRIAL set for 9:00 AM on

April 8, 2024

Deadline to amend pleadings

September 18, 2023

Disclosure of expert testimony under FRCP 26(a)(2)

September 18, 2023

All motions related to discovery must be filed by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the third Friday thereafter (see LCR 7(d))

November 9, 2023

Discovery completed by

December 18, 2023

Dispositive Motions must be filed by and noted on the motions calendar no later

January 18, 2024

than the fourth Friday thereafter (see LCR 7(d))

Motions related to expert witnesses (e.g., Daubert motion) must be filed by and noted on the motions calendar no later than the third Friday thereafter (see LCR 7(d))

January 25, 2024

Motions in Limine due by and noted on the motions calendar no later than the Friday before the Pretrial Conference (see LCR 7(d)(4))

March 7, 2024

Pretrial Order due by

March 22, 2024

Trial Briefs to be submitted by

March 22, 2024

Proposed Voir Dire/Jury Instructions due by

March 22, 2024

Pretrial Conference set for 10:00 AM on

March 29, 2024

For further details concerning the Pretrial Order and the exhibit list contained therein, refer to the Minute Order Setting Trial and Related Dates entered on July 5, 2022, docket no. 19.

Notwithstanding Local Civil Rule 16.1, the exhibit list shall be prepared in table format with the following columns: “Exhibit Number,” “Description,” “Admissibility Stipulated,” “Authenticity Stipulated/Admissibility Disputed,” “Authenticity Disputed,” and “Admitted.” The latter column is for the Clerk's convenience and shall remain blank, but the parties shall indicate the status of an exhibit's authenticity and admissibility by placing an “X” in the appropriate column. Duplicate documents shall not be listed twice: once a party has identified an exhibit in the pretrial order, any party may use it.

The original and one copy of the trial exhibits are to be delivered to the courtroom at a time coordinated with Laurie Cuaresma, who can be reached at laurie_cuaresma@wawd.uscourts.gov or (206) 370-8521, no later than the Friday before trial. Each set of exhibits shall be submitted in a three-ring binder with appropriately numbered tabs. Each exhibit shall be clearly marked. Plaintiff's exhibits shall be numbered consecutively beginning with 1; defendant's exhibits shall be numbered consecutively beginning with the next multiple of 100 after plaintiff's last exhibit; any other party's exhibits shall be numbered consecutively beginning with the next multiple of 100 after defendant's last exhibit. For example, if plaintiff's last exhibit is numbered 159, then defendant's exhibits shall begin with the number 200; if defendant's last exhibit number is 321, then any other party's exhibits shall begin with the number 400.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record.


Summaries of

Jones v. King Cnty.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 1, 2023
C22-0572 TSZ (W.D. Wash. Mar. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Jones v. King Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:TODD RAY JONES, Plaintiff, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Mar 1, 2023

Citations

C22-0572 TSZ (W.D. Wash. Mar. 1, 2023)