From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Kim

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 13, 2021
2:21-cv-04339-VAP-JC (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-04339-VAP-JC

07-13-2021

George Jones v. Chester Kim et al


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE: VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION (IN CHAMBERS)

Plaintiff(s) is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than July 20, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

The Court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this OSCause, on or before the above Dated:

- Plaintiff's request for entry of default
- Answer by the defendant(s) or responsive pleading

In the event both documents are filed before the above date, the answer will take precedence.

In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order will result in the dismissal of the action.


Summaries of

Jones v. Kim

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 13, 2021
2:21-cv-04339-VAP-JC (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Kim

Case Details

Full title:George Jones v. Chester Kim et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 13, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-04339-VAP-JC (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2021)