From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Kellar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 12, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT

09-12-2012

BRUCE W. JONES, Plaintiff, v. MARK KELLAR, individually and in his official capacity as the health service Administrator at FCI-Florence, LISA MCDERMOTT, individually and in her official Capacity as Assistant Health Services Administrator at FCI-Florence, PETER BLUDWORTH, individually and in his official capacity as associate warden at FCI-Florence, MIKE GOODIN, individually and in his official capacity as chief pharmacist at FCI-Florence, DR. DAVID ALFRED, individually and in his official capacity as clinical director of FCI- Florence, DR. GEORGE SANTINI, individually and in his official capacity as staff Physician at FCI- Florenece, CARI RITTER, individually and in her official capacity as mid-level Provider, at FCI-Florence, MRS. A. VINYARD, individually and in her official capacity as Physician assistant at FCI- Florence, GILBERTA TRUJILLO, individually and in her official capacity as secretary of medical at FCI Florence, BARBRA BATULIS, individually and in her official capacity as Pueblo Alpha unit Counsel at FCI Florence, MR. GRIFFIN, individually and in his official capacity as Correctional Officer at FCI-Florence, JOHN DOE, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Health Programs at North Central Region, Leavenworth, Kansas, and DR. JAMES PELTON, individually and in his official capacity as Region Medical Director at North Central Region, Leavenworth, Kansas, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff's "Motion for Discovery" (Doc. No. 92, filed August 22, 2012) is DENIED. Although discovery will be stayed as to all defendants, in the event that discovery is allowed to proceed in the future, the court reminds Plaintiff that the proper process for facilitating discovery is outlined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34. Therein, Plaintiff will find, clearly outlined, the steps necessary to further discovery as to any of the defendants. Above all, requests are to be directed at the opposing party/parties, rather than routed through the court. Although "Plaintiff is not a Lawyer and is sometimes perplexed by what he reads," (Doc. No. 92 at 3) he nonetheless must abide by the same rules that all litigants must abide by, whether proceeding pro se or represented by counsel.


Summaries of

Jones v. Kellar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 12, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Jones v. Kellar

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE W. JONES, Plaintiff, v. MARK KELLAR, individually and in his…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 12, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 12, 2012)