From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Jones

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 30, 1993
624 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 1993)

Opinion

No. 80809.

September 30, 1993.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fifth District — Case No. 91-2258 (Volusia County).

Jeffrey L. Dees, Dunn, Abraham, Swain Dees, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

Peter Keating, Daytona Beach, for respondent.


We review Jones v. Jones, 606 So.2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), based on conflict of decisions. Art V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We recently resolved the conflict in Mize v. Mize, 621 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1993). On the authority of Mize, we quash the decision of the district court of appeal; we remand the case to that court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Mize.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. Jones

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 30, 1993
624 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 1993)
Case details for

Jones v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:HEIDE M. HESS JONES, PETITIONER, v. CURTIS LEE JONES, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 30, 1993

Citations

624 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 1993)

Citing Cases

McClish v. Lee

We remand the issue to the trial court so evidence can be presented for a factual determination of this…

Jones v. Jones

PETERSON, Judge. Our decision in Jones v. Jones, 606 So.2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) was quashed by the supreme…