From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 29, 2010
406 F. App'x 718 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-7442.

Submitted: December 16, 2010.

Decided: December 29, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00748-REP).

Quentin Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Quentin Jones seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 29, 2010
406 F. App'x 718 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Jones v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:Quentin JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, VDOC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 29, 2010

Citations

406 F. App'x 718 (4th Cir. 2010)