From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
May 24, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2047-P (W.D. La. May. 24, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2047-P

05-24-2017

KENNETH PAUL JONES v. TAMARA JACKSON, ET AL.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY

JUDGMENT

To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Magistrate Judge's order dated June 22, 2016 [Record Document 9]. Plaintiff has filed what purports to be an answer to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, though the filing does not substantively respond to the Report and Recommendation, nor does it comply with the Court's previous order. Thus, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, at Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 24th day of MAY 2017.

/s/ _________

ELIZABETH ERNY FOOTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
May 24, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2047-P (W.D. La. May. 24, 2017)
Case details for

Jones v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH PAUL JONES v. TAMARA JACKSON, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: May 24, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2047-P (W.D. La. May. 24, 2017)