Jones v. Hathaway

Full title: MARK JONES, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD P. HATHAWAY, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 9, 2006

Civil Action No. 04-CV-72638-DT (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-CV-72638-DT.

March 9, 2006

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

BERNARD FRIEDMAN, District Judge

Plaintiff has filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment entered in defendants' favor [docket entry 58]. "A court may grant a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend if there is: (1) a clear error of law; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) an intervening change in controlling law; or (4) a need to prevent manifest injustice." Intera Corp. v. Henderson, 428 F.3d 605, 620 (6^th Cir. 2005). In the present case, plaintiff has failed to show the existence of any of these circumstances and, accordingly, his motion to alter or amend the judgment must be and is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.