From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Greyhound Express Port Auth.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
May 17, 2019
63 Misc. 3d 153 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

570036/19

05-17-2019

Joseph C. JONES, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GREYHOUND EXPRESS PORT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment (Debra R. Samuels, J.), entered August 21, 2018, affirmed, without costs.

Applying the narrow review standard in this small claims action (see CCA 1807 ), and giving due deference to the trial court's findings of fact and credibility determinations (see Williams v. Roper , 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 898 [2000] ), we sustain the judgment awarding plaintiff the reasonable value of his property that was lost by defendant, an interstate common carrier. The evidence, fairly interpreted, supports the finding that defendant failed to adduce evidence establishing that it limited its liability to $ 1,000 under the Carmack Amendment "by written declaration of the shipper or by a written agreement between the shipper and the carrier" (see 49 USC § 11706 [c][3] ).


Summaries of

Jones v. Greyhound Express Port Auth.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
May 17, 2019
63 Misc. 3d 153 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

Jones v. Greyhound Express Port Auth.

Case Details

Full title:Joseph C. Jones, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Greyhound Express Port…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: May 17, 2019

Citations

63 Misc. 3d 153 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 50769
115 N.Y.S.3d 583