From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Goldburn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2020
CV 20-8204 PA (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2020)

Opinion

CV 20-8204 PA (ASx)

10-13-2020

DAVID DARYL JONES and JESSIE JOSHUA JONES, Plaintiffs, v. MYVETTE GOLDBURN, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's October 13, 2020 Minute Order granting the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Myvette Goldburn (erroneously sued as Myvetter Goldburg) ("Defendant"), which dismissed the federal claims asserted by plaintiffs David Daryl Jones and Jessie Joshua Jones (collectively "Plaintiffs") against Defendant without leave to amend, declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' remaining state law claims, and remanded those claims to Los Angeles County Superior Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' federal claims brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 242 are dismissed with prejudice. // // //

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' remaining state law claims are remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Compton Courthouse, Case No. 19CMCV00351. DATED: October 13, 2020

/s/_________

Percy Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Goldburn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2020
CV 20-8204 PA (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Jones v. Goldburn

Case Details

Full title:DAVID DARYL JONES and JESSIE JOSHUA JONES, Plaintiffs, v. MYVETTE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 13, 2020

Citations

CV 20-8204 PA (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2020)

Citing Cases

Trask v. Willey

As such, the Court finds that further amendment would be futile because Ms. Trask cannot state a cognizable…

Trask v. Idaho Human Rights Comm'n

The Court finds that amendment would be futile because Ms. Trask cannot state a cognizable claim under 18…