Jones v. Gansky

Full title: MATT JONES AKA MACK JONES, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH GANSKY, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 10, 2024

Civil Action 23-CV-2967 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 23-CV-2967

10-10-2024

MATT JONES AKA MACK JONES, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH GANSKY, et al., Defendants.

KAI SCOTT, J.

ORDER

KAI SCOTT, J.

AND NOW, this 10^th day of October, 2024, upon consideration of (1) Defendant Joseph George's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19), Plaintiff Matt Jones's Response thereto (ECF No. 34), and George's Reply thereon (ECF No. 36); (2) Defendants Christopher Grayo and Matthew Tobie's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 37) and Jones's Response thereto (ECF No. 42); (3) Defendant Joseph Gansky's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 47) and Jones's Response thereto (ECF No. 56); (4) Douglas Muraglia's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 52) and Jones's Responses thereto (ECF No. 57); and (5) Dale Keddie's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 60) and Jones's Responses thereto (ECF No. 55, 56), it is ORDERED that:

1. The Motions (ECF Nos. 19, 37, 47, 52, and 60) are GRANTED for the reasons stated in the Court's accompanying Memorandum.

2. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDCE as to Defendants Joseph George, Christopher Grayo, Mathew Tobie, Joseph Ganksy, Douglas Muraglia, and Dale Keddie. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to TERMINATE Joseph George, Christopher Grayo, Mathew Tobie, Joseph Ganksy, Douglas Muraglia, and Dale Keddie as a Defendants.

3. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, Jones shall SHOW CAUSE why his claims against Defendant Jillian Fox should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to serve.

4. If Jones fails to comply with this Order, his claims against Jillian Fox may be dismissed without further notice.