From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 22, 2009
CIVIL ACTION No. 08-824 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 22, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 08-824.

January 22, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff William Jones, a state prisoner, was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter on June 16, 2008 (Doc. 2). Two payments have been made from his prisoner account in the total amount of $24.74 (Docs. 26 and 34). Defendants have filed a Motion to Strike the Complaint (Doc. 86) and have identified six (6) prior federal cases filed by Jones that were dismissed as frivolous. Defendants assert that Jones runs afoul of the "three strikes" provision of the in forma pauperis statute, and that this case should be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) .

The statute provides:

In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Plaintiff responded to the motion (Doc. 88) and does not contest that he has at least three prior cases that were dismissed as frivolous. Further, the Court's review of the court records referenced by Defendants confirms that Jones has at least three prior "strikes" for purposes of the statute. Hence, the following order.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2009,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order granting William Jones the right to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is VACATED. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time (Doc. 88) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall, on or before February 9, 2009, pay the filing fee in full (at this time, he still owes $324.26), or the undersigned shall recommend that this case be dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are allowed ten (10) days from this date to appeal this order to a district judge pursuant to Rule 72.1.3(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrates. Failure to appeal within ten (10) days may constitute waiver of the right to appeal.


Summaries of

Jones v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 22, 2009
CIVIL ACTION No. 08-824 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Jones v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JONES, Plaintiff, v. SUPT. LOUIS S. FOLINO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 22, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 08-824 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 22, 2009)