From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Fin. Recovery Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 1, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-385-BAJ (M.D. La. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-385-BAJ

11-01-2012

HENRY JONES v. FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.


RULING AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on a motion (doc. 9) by defendant Financial Recovery Services, Inc. ("FRS") for judgment on the pleadings or, alternatively, for summary judgment. Plaintiff Henry Jones, who is proceeding pro se, has been notified of the motion. Mr. Jones has failed to file an opposition. There is no need for oral argument. The court has jurisdiction based on 28 USC §1331.

Plaintiff brings this action claiming that FRS accessed his credit report without a permissible purpose in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), 15 U.S.C. §1681. In support of its motion, FRS has filed an affidavit by defendant's CEO/President, which establishes that FRS had a permissible purpose in accessing the report, i.e., it did so in connection with debt collection efforts. Defendant's motion for summary judgment has been properly supported. Mr. Jones has failed to create a genuine issue of material fact for trial.

Accordingly, the alternative motion (doc. 9) for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED and this action will be dismissed.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 1st day of November, 2012.

_________________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Jones v. Fin. Recovery Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 1, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-385-BAJ (M.D. La. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Jones v. Fin. Recovery Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY JONES v. FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-385-BAJ (M.D. La. Nov. 1, 2012)