From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Evans

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2012
No. CIV S-09-1408 WBS CHS P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1408 WBS CHS P

01-30-2012

JEFFREY DUPREE JONES, Petitioner, v. M.S. EVANS, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas corpus proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In making this determination, the court evaluates the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of Petitioner to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir.1983). Here, Petitioner has articulated his claims reasonably well and the issues presented are not complex. Therefore, the interests of justice do not require the appointment of counsel at this time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is denied.

_______________

CHARLENE H. SORRENTINO

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Evans

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2012
No. CIV S-09-1408 WBS CHS P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Jones v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY DUPREE JONES, Petitioner, v. M.S. EVANS, Respondent.

Court:IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1408 WBS CHS P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)