From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Espinoza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 2009
66 A.D.3d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 2008-02682, F-04020-03.

October 27, 2009.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Budd, J.), dated March 5, 2008, as denied her objections to so much of an order of the same court (Rodriguez, S.M.), dated October 2, 2007, as, after a hearing, denied her petition for reimbursement of medical expenses.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Eng, Chambers and Hall, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The mother had the initial burden of presenting prima facie evidence to show that the father had failed to reimburse her for their daughter's necessary medical expenses for which she had given the father 48 hours advance notice ( see Matter of Paccione v Paccione, 57 AD3d 900, 902; Matter of Biancanello v Russano, 54 AD3d 853, 854; Miller v Miller, 18 AD3d 629, 630). However, the mother failed to meet her burden of demonstrating that the expenses were a medical necessity which fell within the purview of the parties' stipulation of settlement. Moreover, the evidence established that the mother did not provide the father with the required notice before incurring the expenses. Accordingly, the Family Court properly denied the mother's objections.


Summaries of

Jones v. Espinoza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 2009
66 A.D.3d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Jones v. Espinoza

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANDREW D. JONES, Respondent, v. BEATRICE ESPINOZA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 27, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7845
886 N.Y.S.2d 821