From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Dubin Law Grp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 20, 2023
2:23-cv-01269-JHC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01269-JHC

10-20-2023

CORTEZ DAUNDRE JONES, Plaintiff, v. DUBIN LAW GROUP et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN H. CHUN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is non-represented Plaintiff Cortez D. Jones's complaint against Defendants Dubin Law Group et al. (Dkt. # 1-1) and accompanying application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. # 1. On August 30, 2023, Magistrate Judge Peterson recommended the immediate denial of Plaintiff's IFP application. Dkt. # 5. On August 31, 2023, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation and ordered Plaintiff to pay the corresponding filing fee within thirty (30) days of its order. See LCR 3(a). The Court clarified that if Plaintiff failed to do so, the matter would be dismissed. Dkt. # 6. Because thirty (30) days have passed since the Court's order (Dkt. # 6), the Clerk is directed to close and terminate this matter.


Summaries of

Jones v. Dubin Law Grp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 20, 2023
2:23-cv-01269-JHC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Jones v. Dubin Law Grp.

Case Details

Full title:CORTEZ DAUNDRE JONES, Plaintiff, v. DUBIN LAW GROUP et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Oct 20, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01269-JHC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 20, 2023)