From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. DeCamp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 11, 2011
Civil No. 10-697-TC (D. Or. Aug. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-697-TC

08-11-2011

CLARENCE ALLEN JONES, Petitioner, v. JOE DeCAMP, Respondent.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on July 14, 2011. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co.. Ltd.. 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist. 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo. I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jones v. DeCamp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 11, 2011
Civil No. 10-697-TC (D. Or. Aug. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Jones v. DeCamp

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE ALLEN JONES, Petitioner, v. JOE DeCAMP, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 11, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 10-697-TC (D. Or. Aug. 11, 2011)