From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Davis Law Grp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 20, 2023
2:23-cv-01168-JHC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01168-JHC

10-20-2023

CORTEZ DAUNDRE JONES, Plaintiff, v. DAVIS LAW GROUP et al., Defendants.


ORDER

John H. Chun, United States District Judge.

Before the Court is non-represented Plaintiff Cortez D. Jones's complaint against Davis Law Group et al. (Dkt. # 1-1) and accompanying application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. # 1. On August 7, 2023, Magistrate Judge Peterson recommended the denial of Plaintiff's IFP application. Dkt. # 5. On September 1, 2023, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation and ordered Plaintiff to pay the corresponding filing fee within thirty (30) days of its order. See LCR 3(a). The Court clarified that if Plaintiff failed to do so, the matter would be dismissed. Dkt. # 11. Because thirty (30) days have passed since the Court's order (Dkt. # 11), the Clerk is directed to close and terminate this matter.


Summaries of

Jones v. Davis Law Grp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 20, 2023
2:23-cv-01168-JHC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Jones v. Davis Law Grp.

Case Details

Full title:CORTEZ DAUNDRE JONES, Plaintiff, v. DAVIS LAW GROUP et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Oct 20, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01168-JHC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 20, 2023)