From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 25, 2019
No. 3:17-CV-1028-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:17-CV-1028-B-BH

10-25-2019

SAM JONES, ID # 1787475, Petitioner, v. LORIE DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner's Rule 60(b) Motion, received on September 10, 2019 (doc. 50), is hereby DENIED.

SIGNED this 25th day of October , 2019.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 25, 2019
No. 3:17-CV-1028-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Jones v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:SAM JONES, ID # 1787475, Petitioner, v. LORIE DAVIS, Director, Texas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 25, 2019

Citations

No. 3:17-CV-1028-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2019)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Lumpkin

Jones also filed a motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), which was…