From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Courtney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Aug 21, 2012
Case No. 04-2355-JWL (D. Kan. Aug. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 04-2355-JWL

08-21-2012

MILO A. JONES, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN COURTNEY, Defendant.


ORDER

On August 21, 2012, the court held an informal, off-the-record telephone status conference with plaintiff. As set forth in that conference, the court will retain under advisement plaintiff's motion (doc. 229) for hearing in aid of execution until September 4, 2012. By that date, plaintiff shall provide the court with a reliable address of record at which to serve the defendant with notice of the hearing. If plaintiff fails to timely submit an address of record for defendant, plaintiff's motion for hearing in aid of execution shall be denied without prejudice. If plaintiff provides an incorrect address of record for defendant, the court will not grant plaintiff's request to issue a bench warrant for defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated August 21, 2012, at Kansas City, Kansas.

______________________

James P. O'Hara

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Jones v. Courtney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Aug 21, 2012
Case No. 04-2355-JWL (D. Kan. Aug. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Jones v. Courtney

Case Details

Full title:MILO A. JONES, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN COURTNEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Aug 21, 2012

Citations

Case No. 04-2355-JWL (D. Kan. Aug. 21, 2012)