From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 21, 2015
603 F. App'x 234 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-6034

05-21-2015

CASSIUS L. JONES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections for Virginia, Respondent - Appellee.

Darryl Arthur Parker, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Steven Andrew Witmer, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00306-RAJ-DEM) Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darryl Arthur Parker, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Steven Andrew Witmer, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Cassius L. Jones seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that the petition be dismissed as untimely and advised Jones that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Jones has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Jones v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 21, 2015
603 F. App'x 234 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Jones v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:CASSIUS L. JONES, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 21, 2015

Citations

603 F. App'x 234 (4th Cir. 2015)