Opinion
2:21-cv-00241-CDS-DJA
04-06-2023
GENOA JONES and CORNELL TINSLEY, individuals, Plaintiffs v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, Nevada, a Municipal Corporation; SERGEANT SCOTT SALKOFF, an individual and OFFICER MICHAEL ROSE, an individual, Defendants
NAYLOR & BRASTER Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982 Benjamin B. Gordon Nevada Bar No. 15552 Margaret A. McLetchie Nevada Bar No. 10931 Leo S Wolpert Nevada Bar No. 12658 MCLETCHIE LAW Attorneys for Plaintiffs Genoa Jones and Cornell Tinsley NORTH LAS VEGAS CITY ATTORNEY OFFICE Micaela Rustia Moore Nevada Bar No. 9676 Noel E. Eidsmore Nevada Bar No. 7688 Rhiann Jarvis Denman Nevada Bar No. 13509 Attorneys for Defendants City of North Las, Sgt. Scott Salkojj, and Officer Michael Rose
NAYLOR & BRASTER Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982 Benjamin B. Gordon Nevada Bar No. 15552 Margaret A. McLetchie Nevada Bar No. 10931 Leo S Wolpert Nevada Bar No. 12658 MCLETCHIE LAW Attorneys for Plaintiffs Genoa Jones and Cornell Tinsley
NORTH LAS VEGAS CITY ATTORNEY OFFICE Micaela Rustia Moore Nevada Bar No. 9676 Noel E. Eidsmore Nevada Bar No. 7688 Rhiann Jarvis Denman Nevada Bar No. 13509 Attorneys for Defendants City of North Las, Sgt. Scott Salkojj, and Officer Michael Rose
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs Genoa Jones and Cornell Tinsley (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants City of North Las Vegas, Sergeant Scott Salkoff, and Officer Michael Rose (“Defendants”), collectively (the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation and order to extend the time for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35) pursuant to LR 7-1 and LRIA 6-2.
On March 23, 2023, Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 35). Plaintiffs's response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement is due on April 13, 2023. (ECF No. 35). Defendants' reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment is due on April 27, 2023.
The Parties agree that each shall have reciprocal extensions on the remaining briefing. Specifically, Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35) shall be due by April 27, 2023, and Defendants' reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35) shall be due on May 11, 2023. This is the Parties first request for an extension of time to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. This request is sought due to conflicting deadlines in other matters of Plaintiffs' counsel.
IT IS SO STIPULATED THAT THE PARTIES SHALL HAVE RECIPROCAL EXTENSIONS.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.