From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 15, 2005
No. CIV S-02-0979 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-0979 DFL KJM P.

September 15, 2005


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prison inmate proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 29, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 29, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Jones v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 15, 2005
No. CIV S-02-0979 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2005)
Case details for

Jones v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH A. JONES, Petitioner, v. TOM L. CAREY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 15, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-02-0979 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2005)