From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. CAL-PIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 26, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-0218 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-0218 KJM CKD P

06-26-2018

GEORGE RAYMOND JONES, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAL-PIA, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On May 16, 2018, plaintiff was granted thirty days within which to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to do so would result in dismissal. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// ///// waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: June 26, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
jone0218.fta


Summaries of

Jones v. CAL-PIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 26, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-0218 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Jones v. CAL-PIA

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE RAYMOND JONES, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAL-PIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 26, 2018

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-0218 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2018)