From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Butler

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 14, 2016
654 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-6001

06-14-2016

DAVID EARL JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL G. BUTLER, JR.; WILLIS J. FOWLER; ANTHONY E. RAND; DERRICK WADSWORTH, Defendants - Appellees, and BEVERLY PERDUE; PATRICK L. MCCRORY, Defendants.

David Earl Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03142-D) Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Earl Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Earl Jones appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Butler, No. 5:14-ct-03142-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2015). We deny as unnecessary Jones' motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Jones v. Butler

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 14, 2016
654 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Jones v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EARL JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL G. BUTLER, JR.; WILLIS J…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 14, 2016

Citations

654 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

Leak v. Butler

Leak, however, received the requisite due process protections. See, e.g., Burnette v. Fahey, 687 F.3d 171,…