Opinion
Civil Action 20-0655
10-19-2021
CHARLES E. JONES v. AUSTIN BLACKMAN, ET AL.
SECTION P
KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY, MAG. JUDGE
JUDGMENT
TERRY A. DOUFHTY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 63] having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion for Partial Summary [Doc. No. 47] filed by Defendant Ruby Stanley (“Stanley”) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs conversion claim against Stanley is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 19th day of October 2021. 1
JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the following are DISMISSED as frivolous and for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted: (1) Plaintiff Charles E. Jones's claim that Blackman and Mitchell placed him in administrative segregation without a prior administrative hearing; (2) Plaintiff's negligence claim; (3) Plaintiff's access-to-court claim; (4) Plaintiff's claim that Ruby Stanley refused to return his work release job; and (5) Plaintiff's request for relief concerning lost good-time credits. 2