From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Blackman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
May 5, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0655 SECTION P (W.D. La. May. 5, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0655 SECTION P

05-05-2021

CHARLES E. JONES v. AUSTIN BLACKMAN, ET AL.


MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 33] having been considered, together with the written Objection [Doc. No. 34] filed by Defendants on May 4, 2021, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 24], is DENIED.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 5th day of May, 2021.

/s/_________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Blackman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
May 5, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0655 SECTION P (W.D. La. May. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Blackman

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. JONES v. AUSTIN BLACKMAN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: May 5, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0655 SECTION P (W.D. La. May. 5, 2021)