Jones v. Ballesteros

Full title: JEREMY JONES, Plaintiff, v. BALLESTEROS, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 26, 2013

2:10-cv-2661-KJM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2013)

Opinion

JEREMY JONES, Plaintiff, v. BALLESTEROS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-cv-2661-KJM-EFB P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 26, 2013

          ORDER

          KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On August 27, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed August 27, 2013, are adopted in full; and

         2. Defendant Choplin's November 30, 2012 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 38) is denied.