Jones v. Astrue

1 Citing case

  1. Pacheco v. Colvin

    CIV. NO. 13-848 GBW (D.N.M. Oct. 6, 2014)   Cited 1 times

    However, they do not always indicate that a claimant's impairment "severely interferes with an ability to perform basic work activities." Jones v. Astrue, 2009 WL 1360083 (D. Kan. May 14, 2009). The Tenth Circuit has held that an ALJ errs for failing to consider the impact of a claimant's GAF score on his ability to work where there is significant evidence of mental impairments in the record and the GAF score was determined by the claimant's treating physician.