From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 10, 2012
07-CV-145A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

07-CV-145A

01-10-2012

RODNEY JONES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

On November 22, 2011, counsel for plaintiff Rodney Jones filed a motion (Dkt. No. 23) for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Plaintiff's counsel, Kenneth Hiller, seeks an award of $18,727.63 to compensate him for approximately 32 hours spent prosecuting this case to a successful remand on May 22, 2008. Plaintiff's counsel has submitted several pieces of information in support of the request for attorney fees. Counsel has informed the Court that, since the remand, the Commissioner of Social Security awarded disability insurance benefits retroactive to July 1, 2004, and awarded $98,910.50 in past-due benefits. Counsel also has submitted a contemporaneously generated itemization of the time spent litigating in this case. Finally, counsel has provided a copy of the contingency agreement that he had with his client and has noted that the agreement does not step outside of the bounds that the United States Supreme Court established in Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002).

The Commissioner filed a response to counsel's motion on December 16, 2011. The Commissioner "does not object to the award of a reasonable attorney fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)" (Dkt. No. 25 at 4) so long as any award does not exceed 25% of the award of past-due benefits as set forth in that statute.

After reviewing counsel's request and itemization of time spent, the Court finds that the requested award does not exceed the statutory limit set in 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The Court finds further that counsel's request is reasonable and consistent with the principles set forth in Gisbrecht. See also, e.g., Buckingham v. Astrue, No. 07-CV-159, 2010 WL 4174773, at *3 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2010) (Curtin, J.) ("Upon review [of] Mr. Hiller's application in light of these considerations, the court finds that the amount . . . is warranted as a reasonable attorney's fee under the circumstances of his successful representation of plaintiff in this action. Significantly, the Commissioner does not directly challenge the reasonableness of the amount requested . . . .").

Accordingly, the Court grants counsel's motion. The Commissioner is hereby directed to take the steps necessary to cause the amount of $18,727.63 ($24,727.63 less $6,000 previously paid to Mr. Hiller pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(a)) to be made payable to Mr. Hiller from the fund of withheld past due benefits, and to adjust the fund accordingly, in compliance with the requirements of the Social Security Act and implementing regulations as interpreted by the federal courts, and in full satisfaction of the obligations imposed by this order.

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 10, 2012
07-CV-145A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Jones v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY JONES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

07-CV-145A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2012)