From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Arnette

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)

Opinion

1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC

08-31-2021

JEREMY JONES, Plaintiff, v. ARNETTE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 101.)

SEPTEMBER 1, 2021 -- DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

GARY S. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. On August 24, 2021, defendants Arnett, Gonzales, Flores, and Keener (“Defendants”) filed a motion for extension of time until September 1, 2021 in which to respond to Plaintiffs second set of requests for production of documents. (ECF No. 101.)

The Court finds good cause to grant Defendants an extension of time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted an extension of time until September 1, 2021 in which to respond to Plaintiffs second set of requests for production of documents.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Arnette

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Arnette

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY JONES, Plaintiff, v. ARNETTE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2021

Citations

1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)