Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Jones v. Anderson

250 S.W.3d 894 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Jones v. Anderson

1 Citing case

  1. Harber v. Dixon

    No. E2019-00028-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 12, 2019)

    From a legal standpoint, the acts of the plaintiff in this case were clearly for the benefit of all of the owners of the property.Jones v. Anderson, 250 S.W.3d 894, 898 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). When Mr. Pruitt redeemed parcel 36, he did so for the benefit of all of the cotenants, not just himself.