Jones v. Anderson

1 Citing case

  1. Harber v. Dixon

    No. E2019-00028-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 12, 2019)

    From a legal standpoint, the acts of the plaintiff in this case were clearly for the benefit of all of the owners of the property.Jones v. Anderson, 250 S.W.3d 894, 898 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). When Mr. Pruitt redeemed parcel 36, he did so for the benefit of all of the cotenants, not just himself.