From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Amtrak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 15, 2011
CASE NO. CV F 11-0969 LJO MJS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV F 11-0969 LJO MJS

09-15-2011

JODI JONES, Plaintiff, v. AMTRAK, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., Defendants.


ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT (Doc. 9.)

Defense counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than October 24, 2011, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed.

This Court VACATES all pending dates and matters, including the September 15, 2011 scheduling conference.

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Amtrak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 15, 2011
CASE NO. CV F 11-0969 LJO MJS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Jones v. Amtrak

Case Details

Full title:JODI JONES, Plaintiff, v. AMTRAK, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV F 11-0969 LJO MJS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)