Jones v. Aluminum Corporation of America

Full title: SUZANNE JONES, Plaintiff, vs. ALUMINUM CORPORATION OF AMERICA, successor…

Court: United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: May 8, 2003

Case No. 2:01CV150 DAK (D. Utah May. 8, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 2:01CV150 DAK

May 8, 2003

ORDER

DALE A. KIMBALL, United States District Judge

This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. Defendant previously argued that it was entitled to summary judgment because, among other things, no reasonable jury could reconcile Plaintiffs statements to the SSA with the position she has taken in this lawsuit. This court disagreed with Defendant, determining that a reasonable jury could reconcile Plaintiffs statements to the SSA with the position she has taken in this lawsuit. The court concluded that the issue could not be decided as a matter of law.

Disagreeing with the court's ruling, Defendant has now filed a motion for reconsideration, which merely rehashes and elaborates on the arguments that were previously made to the court. Defendant has provided no basis for this court to reconsider its previous ruling. Nevertheless, the court has considered Defendant's arguments once again declines to grant summary judgment to Defendant.

Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.