From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones-Bey v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 14, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-153 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-153 Erie.

March 14, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on June 3, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 6], filed on February 23, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 6] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on February 23, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Jones-Bey v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 14, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-153 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Jones-Bey v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS W. JONES-BEY, Petitioner, v. JAMES SHERMAN, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 14, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-153 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2006)

Citing Cases

Crutchfield v. U.S. Parole Com'n

28 C.F.R. § 2,80(e) (1), thereby indicating that the decision whether to award credit is a discretionary one.…