From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones-Bell v. Imperial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Oct 17, 2023
2:22-cv-03855 (W.D. La. Oct. 17, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-03855

10-17-2023

RHONDA A JONES-BELL v. IMPERIAL FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.


JAMES D. CAIN, JR., JUDGE

NOTICE AND ORDER

KATHLEEN KAY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company filed a Diversity Jurisdiction Disclosure Statement [doc. 17] into the record. After review of the document, we find that Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company has failed to adequately allege its citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Specifically, instead of listing its own place of incorporation and principal place of business, Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company informed the court that it is a “wholly-owned subsidiary of National General Holdings Corp., which is a Delaware corporation.” Doc. 17. For diversity purposes, a corporation is a citizen of its state of incorporation and the state where it has its principal place of business. 28 U.S.C. § 1332; Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 130 S.Ct. 1181 (2010). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, on or before October 19, 2023, Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company is to amend its Diversity Jurisdiction Disclosure Statement [doc. 17] to use the proper method to allege its citizenship, i.e., Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company's state of incorporation and principal place of business.


Summaries of

Jones-Bell v. Imperial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Oct 17, 2023
2:22-cv-03855 (W.D. La. Oct. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Jones-Bell v. Imperial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RHONDA A JONES-BELL v. IMPERIAL FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 17, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-03855 (W.D. La. Oct. 17, 2023)

Citing Cases

Semmes v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

The hearing also concerned motions to intervene with virtually identical procedural histories in Brent…