From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Skyla Lanie B.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 22, 2014
116 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-22

In re SKYLA LANIE B., A Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Jonathan Miranda B., Respondent–Appellant, Episcopal Social Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Carol Kahn, New York, for appellant. Rosin Steinhagen Mendel, New York (Douglas H. Reiniger of counsel), for respondent.


Carol Kahn, New York, for appellant. Rosin Steinhagen Mendel, New York (Douglas H. Reiniger of counsel), for respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Bobette M. Masson–Churin of counsel), attorney for the child.

Order of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Karen L. Lupuloff, J.), entered on or about May 10, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, committed the guardianship and custody of the subject child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent father failed to preserve his argument that the dispositional hearing was not full and fair because an Investigation and Report or forensic study of respondent's and the foster mother's family had not been performed, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find it unavailing. As a notice father, respondent received the rights to which he was due—namely, notice of the proceeding and an opportunity to be heard concerning the child's best interests ( seeSocial Services Law § 384–c; Domestic Relations Law § 111–a; Matter of Sjuqwan Anthony Zion Perry M. [Charnise Antonia M.], 111 A.D.3d 473, 473, 975 N.Y.S.2d 387 [1st Dept.2013] ). Further, a preponderance of the evidence supports the Family Court's determination that the child's best interests would be served by freeing her for adoption ( see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147–148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). Respondent has had limited contact with the child, and the foster mother, with whom the child has lived for over two years, has been attentive to the child's special needs and wishes to adopt her ( see Matter of Harold Ali D.-E. [Rubin Louis E.], 94 A.D.3d 449, 450, 942 N.Y.S.2d 50 [1st Dept.2012] ). MAZZARELLI, J.P., FRIEDMAN, DeGRASSE, FREEDMAN, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Skyla Lanie B.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 22, 2014
116 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

In re Skyla Lanie B.

Case Details

Full title:In re SKYLA LANIE B., A Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 22, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
116 A.D.3d 589
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2706