From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joksimovich v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
May 30, 2012
No. CV 12-0809-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. May. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV 12-0809-PHX-FJM

05-30-2012

Gordon Joksimovich, Plaintiff, v. Wells Fargo Bank, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the court is defendant Wells Fargo Bank's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (doc. 4). Plaintiff did not respond to the motion and the time for doing so has long since expired. We also have before us defendant's motion for summary disposition (doc. 5) based on plaintiff's failure to respond.

Plaintiff's failure to respond to the motion to dismiss may be deemed a consent to the granting of the motion and we may dispose of the motion summarily. LRCiv 7.2(i). We agree with defendant that plaintiff has failed to state a cognizable claim for relief.

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 4), and GRANTING defendant's motion for summary disposition (doc. 5). Because no amendment could cure plaintiff's defective claim, IT IS ORDERED that the clerk shall enter final judgment.

____________

Frederick J. Martone

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Joksimovich v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
May 30, 2012
No. CV 12-0809-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. May. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Joksimovich v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:Gordon Joksimovich, Plaintiff, v. Wells Fargo Bank, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

No. CV 12-0809-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. May. 30, 2012)