From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnstone v. City of San Carlos

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 5, 2010
No. C 09-4872 PJH (N.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2010)

Opinion

No. C 09-4872 PJH.

February 5, 2010


ORDER


The court is in receipt of a letter filed by plaintiff's counsel, in which counsel notes that he inadvertently failed to include pages 11 and 12 in his opposition brief to defendant City of San Carlos and Jeff McCourtie's motion to dismiss.

If plaintiff wishes pages 11 and 12 of his opposition to be taken into consideration by the court, plaintiff is hereby instructed to electronically file in the docket the missing pages to his opposition brief, as soon as possible and in any event no later than Monday, February 8. If defendant thereafter wishes to reply to any substantive argument raised in plaintiff's missing brief pages, defendant shall do so orally, at the hearing on the motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnstone v. City of San Carlos

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 5, 2010
No. C 09-4872 PJH (N.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Johnstone v. City of San Carlos

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW JOHNSTONE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN CARLOS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 5, 2010

Citations

No. C 09-4872 PJH (N.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2010)