From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnston v. Sterling Mortg. & Inv. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 30, 2016
SC: 153883 (Mich. Nov. 30, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153883

11-30-2016

RONALD E. JOHNSTON, ROSEMARIE P. JOHNSTON, and WILLIAM R. CONNOLLY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STERLING MORTGAGE & INVESTMENT COMPANY, CITI INVESTMENTS LLC, CITI INVESTMENT, LLC, and EMRE URALLI, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 324855
Oakland CC: 2014-142153-CH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 14, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 30, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Johnston v. Sterling Mortg. & Inv. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 30, 2016
SC: 153883 (Mich. Nov. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Johnston v. Sterling Mortg. & Inv. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD E. JOHNSTON, ROSEMARIE P. JOHNSTON, and WILLIAM R. CONNOLLY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Nov 30, 2016

Citations

SC: 153883 (Mich. Nov. 30, 2016)