From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnston v. Naughton

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 29, 2022
3:22-cv-00080-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00080-MMD-CSD

11-29-2022

RICHARD JOHNSTON, Plaintiff v. DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON, Defendant


ORDER

RE: ECF NO. 73

Craig S. Denney, United States Magistrate Judge

Before the court is Plaintiff's motion for an order directing Defendant to produce documents to the court under seal. (ECF No. 73.) Defendant filed a response. (ECF No. 78.)

On September 26, 2022, the court issued an order requiring Defendant to file an update on or before October 21, 2022, regarding the status of Plaintiff's appointment with Dr. Ichino, and any update regarding the placement of Plaintiff's spinal cord stimulator. (ECF No. 59.)

On October 20, 2022, Defendant filed a notice advising the court that Plaintiff was approved by the Utilization Review Panel to see Dr. Ichino at Renown, and the Northern Nevada Correctional Center (NNCC) scheduler contacted Renown, and Plaintiff is scheduled to see Dr. Ichino before the end of the year. (ECF No. 71.)

In this motion, Plaintiff claims that Defendant's notice is vague, and as a result, he asks the court to direct counsel to file under seal the prison's consult/referral appointment medical document (form DOC 2656), which will advise the court of the date of the request, the referral by which doctor, the authorization date, and the appointment date. (ECF No. 59.)

In his response, Defendant states that he does not necessarily oppose Plaintiff's motion, but he argues the request is improper because the request was not made in discovery, and Plaintiff did not meet and confer before filing the motion. (ECF No. 78.)

The court asked Defendant to provide an update regarding the status of Plaintiff's appointment with Dr. Ichino, and Defendant complied. The court takes as true the representation made in the declaration accompanying the notice that Plaintiff is scheduled to see Dr. Ichino before the end of the year. It is not necessary for Defendant to file the referral/appointment form with the court. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 73) is DENIED. The court will require Defendant to file another status update regarding the outcome of Plaintiff's appointment with Dr. Ichino and any other update regarding the placement of the spinal cord stimulator with the court on or before January 10, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnston v. Naughton

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 29, 2022
3:22-cv-00080-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Johnston v. Naughton

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD JOHNSTON, Plaintiff v. DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 29, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00080-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2022)