From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnston v. Brisco

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Harrison Division
May 30, 2007
06-CV-03002 (W.D. Ark. May. 30, 2007)

Opinion

06-CV-03002.

May 30, 2007


ORDER


Now on this 30th day of May 2007, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on May 8, 2007, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 213). Plaintiffs filed written objections to the report and recommendation (Doc. 220).

The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment filed by Separate Defendants Danny Hickman, Jason Day and Boone County (Doc. 170) is GRANTED with respect to all claims except Plaintiffs' claims that they were subjected to unconstitutional conditions of confinement while in the Boone County Jail. The motion is DENIED as to those claims. Further, the motion for summary judgment filed by Separate Defendants Jason Brisco, Lyle Smith and Paul Woodruff (Doc. 184) is GRANTED, and these Separate Defendants are DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnston v. Brisco

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Harrison Division
May 30, 2007
06-CV-03002 (W.D. Ark. May. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Johnston v. Brisco

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT D. JOHNSTON and MELANIE K. JOHNSTON PLAINTIFFS v. JASON BRISCO, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Harrison Division

Date published: May 30, 2007

Citations

06-CV-03002 (W.D. Ark. May. 30, 2007)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Simes

Those limited circumstances exist when the incumbent prosecuting attorney is being investigated or charged…

Jones v. Neb. Dep't of Corr. Servs.

Section 1987 does not allow a private cause of action. Carmona v. Sausen, No. CIV. 00-2447, 2006 WL 763211,…