From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Willis

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 19, 2023
2:17-cv-01121-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2023)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01121-APG-EJY

10-19-2023

LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID WILLIS, et al., Defendants.

Frank M. Flansburg, III., Esq. Emily A. Ellis, Esq. Maliq I. Kendricks, Esq. BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Lausteveion Johnson. Aaron D. Ford, Esq. Leo T. Hendges, Esq. STATE OF NEVADA Office of the Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Rashonda Smith and Douglas Thrasher.


Frank M. Flansburg, III., Esq. Emily A. Ellis, Esq. Maliq I. Kendricks, Esq. BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Lausteveion Johnson.

Aaron D. Ford, Esq. Leo T. Hendges, Esq. STATE OF NEVADA Office of the Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Rashonda Smith and Douglas Thrasher.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff Lausteveion Johnson (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel of record of the law firm Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP; and Defendants Rashonda Smith and Douglas Thrasher (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, hereby stipulate and agree, contingent on this Court's approval, as follows:

1. This stipulation is made pursuant to LR IA 6-1.
2. On July 11, 2023, Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendants' Motion”). See ECF No. 174.
3. Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion was originally due on August 1, 2023.
4. On July 21, 2023, this Court granted the Parties' Stipulation and Order to Extend Time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request), extending the deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants' Motion until fourteen (14)
days after the conclusion on any unsuccessful global settlement conference or mediation. See ECF No. 176.
5. A settlement conference was held on October 5, 2023, which was unsuccessful.
6. As a result, Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion is currently due on October 19, 2023.
7. Plaintiff's counsel are restaffing this matter and need time to meaningfully consult with Plaintiff on Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion.
8. The parties agree and respectfully request that the deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants' Motion be extended one week to October 26, 2023.
9. This is the second request for an extension of this deadline.
10. This stipulation is made in good faith and is not made in an attempt to delay proceedings.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Willis

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 19, 2023
2:17-cv-01121-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Johnson v. Willis

Case Details

Full title:LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID WILLIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 19, 2023

Citations

2:17-cv-01121-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2023)